I agree that no one knows what goes on in a marriage. However, when one 
willingly becomes a public figure, then one has to accept that one's private 
life is also going to come under scrutiny. My opinion is based on the 
observable behaviors not on what I imagine anyone was thinking or feeling. 





On Friday, November 1, 2013 3:54 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
<authfri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
  
 What we should all recognize (but only some of us have the smarts to 
understand) is that NOBODY KNOWS what goes on inside a marriage but the two 
people in it. (Unless they choose to tell us; Bill and Hillary chose not to 
tell us what went on between them with regard to the Monica affair. And good 
for them; it's none of our damn business.)

We cannot know what contingencies, agreements, understandings, conditions, 
promises, etc., etc., are operative in a given marriage (ESPECIALLY when it's 
one we see only from a distance through the media).

It is the absolute height of arrogant stupidity to declare that he or she or 
they should have done this, that, or the other thing in connection with a 
marital problem.

It's fine to say, "If I were Hillary, I would have done thus-and-so." (Although 
obviously you don't really know what you would have done given that you don't 
know what it's like to be married to Bill.)

But for all we know, it could have been Bill who was the doormat in this 
situation. Think about it. If you don't see how that might have been the case, 
you have a very limited imagination, not to mention knowledge of human beings.

(Caveat for the brainlessly literal-minded: I'm not saying I think that WAS the 
case, just that it could have been. It could have been a lot of other things 
too. We simply do not know enough to have an opinion.)


Share spewed:


> MJ, IMO, that's where Hillary should have drawn the line with regards to his 
> womanizing. I mean, that affair 
> occurred on the world stage! And the woman was so young! I've read that 
> Hillary really loves Bill. Even 
> more reason she should have stopped enabling him. Long overdue IMO.  



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


Why would Hillary divorce him over that? He had already had numerous affairs 
after he became governor in Arkansas - you don't understand the motivation of 
such a person - its better to have a philandering husband who is President than 
a faithful one who is a nobody.


Reply via email to