Richard, Ann was talking about Sweet Share (-:
On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 9:57 AM, Richard J. Williams
<pundits...@gmail.com> wrote:
Let me rephrase that:
NOBODY cares if you care what Share cares about. NOBODY.
On 12/9/2013 8:44 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote:
>
>
>Let me rephrase that:
>
>NOBODY cares that you're working from home and NOBODY
cares if you're posting
>here in between working for clients and NOBODY cares
if you have any clients
>and almost NOBODY cares if you post anything or not.
Almost NOBODY.
>
>
>Can I just say this: NOBODY cares what you wore today. NOBODY cares what your
>face looked like today. NOBODY cares where you drove by during your mundane
>day, NOBODY. Oh, except Sweet Share.
>
>
>On 12/9/2013 1:23 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" wrote:
>>>
>>> Let's make this real simple so everyone
understands:
>>>
>>> NOBODY cares that you're working from home
and NOBODY cares if you're
>>> posting here in between working for clients
and NOBODY cares if you have
>>> any clients and NOBODY cares if you post
anything or not. NOBODY.
>>
>>
>>I dunno, Richard. I, for one, would love to see her come up with this
>>"detailed refuation" she's been crowing about for so long.
>>
>>So, speaking in my capacity as "someone
other than Xeno who takes Richard
seriously enough to want a detailed
refutation," I want one.
>>
>>Failure to produce one will prove Judy a
liar, because she made that very offer
just below.
>>
>>I expect exact quotes, URLs, and
citations. Maybe even a bibliography and
footnotes. :-)
>>
>>
