Richard, Ann was talking about Sweet Share (-:
On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 9:57 AM, Richard J. Williams <pundits...@gmail.com> wrote: Let me rephrase that: NOBODY cares if you care what Share cares about. NOBODY. On 12/9/2013 8:44 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: > > >---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote: > > >Let me rephrase that: > >NOBODY cares that you're working from home and NOBODY cares if you're posting >here in between working for clients and NOBODY cares if you have any clients >and almost NOBODY cares if you post anything or not. Almost NOBODY. > > >Can I just say this: NOBODY cares what you wore today. NOBODY cares what your >face looked like today. NOBODY cares where you drove by during your mundane >day, NOBODY. Oh, except Sweet Share. > > >On 12/9/2013 1:23 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" wrote: >>> >>> Let's make this real simple so everyone understands: >>> >>> NOBODY cares that you're working from home and NOBODY cares if you're >>> posting here in between working for clients and NOBODY cares if you have >>> any clients and NOBODY cares if you post anything or not. NOBODY. >> >> >>I dunno, Richard. I, for one, would love to see her come up with this >>"detailed refuation" she's been crowing about for so long. >> >>So, speaking in my capacity as "someone other than Xeno who takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation," I want one. >> >>Failure to produce one will prove Judy a liar, because she made that very offer just below. >> >>I expect exact quotes, URLs, and citations. Maybe even a bibliography and footnotes. :-) >> >>