It's very strange, to say the least, and I actually posted a long essay pointing out that the TM mantras are vibration sounds that have no semantic meaning! Everybody knows that MMY wrote the Beacon Light and everybody knows that MMY loved the nicknames of the personal gods. Everybody that does TM knows this, except Judy fibbed about it. That was wrong of her to do that.

Judy told a big fib and then she denied it. She should have said IN MY OPINION, the TM mantras are not the nicknames of the Hindu personal gods. She made it sound like MMY was a liar and a deceiver. That was wrong for her to do that - TMers love MMY and we do not think he was a liar or a deceiver. TMers do not have a problem with the TM mantras being the names of the personal gods.

And, it was a fib for Judy to then call me a liar. Judy told several fibs and won't admit it. It was wrong of Judy to say I was trolling, trying to get everyone to shun me. Go figure.

On 12/9/2013 11:21 AM, anartax...@yahoo.com wrote:

I take Richard seriously; he has been posting some really interesting material. Additionally, he seems like a real human being. So why not just post the detailed refutation? Just don't get into a discussion with me, as you know, you specifically said you would never have a discussion with me unless certain events were to occur, and these events have not happened. You cannot directly quote me in making a response for otherwise you would prove yourself untruthful. I do not believe Richard is trolling here. I am convinced he has a valid point. I do not see why it is so important to you to appear to be a paragon of truth, for you are not coming off that way at all. Why not test this by lying to everyone you know for a couple of days and see if they notice any difference. They should be subtle lies, for those are the best kind, as if you did not already know.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote:

This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.




Reply via email to