I enjoyed this movie too. I think it may have been a special challenge for Emma 
Thompson to play someone so uptight, so closed in. I did not know that Travers 
was even worse as a human being than as Thompson played her out.
 

 One of my earliest spiritual epiphanies occurred in the parking lot of 
Disneyland (I had been there once before, some 15 years previously). I had 
watched a lot of the real Disney on TV in my youth. Something special about 
him. I had gone to Los Angeles to look over equipment offerings at a 
convention. I ended up really exhausted, and sick. I had a half day to kill, I 
went to Disneyland in Anaheim. I went on rides. I don't remember what I ate. I 
even went through that ride some old geezer sued the park for for having 
stranded him there for a few hours - It's a small world. As I left the park, I 
felt just miserable, but in thinking about what Disney had created I experience 
an overwhelming appreciation of what he had managed to accomplish and I just 
broke down and cried in the parking lot. A huge wave of release, followed by a 
deep silence. Probably the third or fourth spiritual experience I ever had, 
just a few months after the first one I ever had. I think I must have been (and 
still am in some ways) like Travers, closed in and tight, not really realising 
just how out of the stream of life I was.
 

 I was with someone years later in an amusement park in St. Louis. She felt 
such parks were superficial, but then realised that she observed that everybody 
she was watching seemed happy - everyone, not just a few here and there. Disney 
had a good heart, and he knew how to market feeling good, or perhaps out of 
necessity, he learned how to market it. Twenty two Academy Awards, and four 
honorary ones. Not bad.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote:

 This is a strange movie for *me* to be reviewing, and even stranger to be 
reviewing positively, but react to it positively I did. After all, it's a 
Disney movie, and worse, it's *about* Walt Disney, someone whose sensibilities 
with regard to fairy tales and the dilution of them I do not admire. 

And yet. I was charmed by many things in this film. I felt that the script was 
wonderfully written, and directed just as well. And there have been exactly 
*zero* other films this year that knocked my socks off by the strength of their 
"ensemble performances" the way this one did. The combination of Emma Thompson 
as the irascible P.L. Travers, arguing tooth and nail with Walt Disney (Tom 
Hanks, better than I would have imagined) over whether she was going to give 
him the film rights to her book "Mary Poppins" are pretty much unbeatable from 
start to finish. Add to them Paul Giamatti as her limo driver in L.A., Colin 
Farrell as her father in flashbacks, and Annie Rose Buckley as Travers herself 
as a child, and this is pretty much a dream cast, crafting a dream. 

Yes, it's schmaltzy, yes, it's a bit of a tearjerker in parts, and yes, it's 
manipulative. But it *works*, and it's a damned pity that the Academy Awards 
chose to ignore it, except for its musical score. The Golden Globes, to their 
credit, at least nominated Emma Thompson as Best Actress, and in my opinion she 
acted circles around any of the other nominees, or at least the ones whose 
films I've seen so far. 

The real P.L. Travers was supposedly a total bitch who, according to her own 
adoptive grandchildren, "died loving no one and with no one loving her." This 
film showed a better side of her, one that I wish the old tyrant had gotten to 
see in life. If she had, she might have lightened up a bit and learned to laugh 
at herself a bit more, and thus had a happier life. 



Reply via email to