So don't read them! (And if both of us are boring you with our posts, why dump 
on me and not him?) 

 << In this context, Uncle Tantra's character is irrelevant.   It's just that 
reading your posts and his posts is like 
listening to a broken record.

Same old, same old. >>

 > --- authfriend <authfriend@...> wrote:
> 
 > <snicker> Jason, dear, you're not quite with it, I'm afraid. Why don't you 
 > just post some more charts and skip reading my posts? (Note that I never 
 > asked you whether those chart posts were necessary. Nor will I share what 
 > you've written to me in email.)
 > 

 > I have plenty of friends my own age, thank you very much. (Were you thinking 
 > Barry was a lot younger? How old are you, come to think of it?)
 

 << Again, is this post necessary?

Judy, you need to take some time out, or maybe move to 
Fairfield where people of your own age group can give you 
company. >>

 > > > --- authfriend <authfriend@...> wrote:
> > > 
 > > > That's quite an admission, Barry, that Nabby is more believable than you 
 > > > are. (Not that it's news to the rest of us, but to see you come right 
 > > > out and say it yourself is a surprise.)

 
> > > > On Sat, 2/22/14, TurquoiseBee <turquoiseb@...> wrote:
> > > > 
 << So why don't you write about these experiences instead of focusing on 
saviors that will never come and UFOs that aren't real and Maharishi 
predictions that have not and will never come true? This is one of the only 
"personal" posts you've ever made, and I thought it came across well. A little 
more of this kinda stuff might go a long ways towards dispelling the image of 
you as the second-least believable person on the forum. >>

<I would have thought that was obvious, but I'll leave it open to see who 
"applies for the position" by becoming outraged and defensive.  :-)> 





 







Reply via email to