John, he has often stated that he never intends to marry. In fact, he broke up 
with one girlfriend simply because she admitted in an interview that she wanted 
to marry someday and have children. 


On Saturday, April 5, 2014 3:33 PM, "jr_...@yahoo.com" <jr_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
  
Share,

Now that you've mentioned it, I've always wondered why George Clooney is still 
single after dating all of those gorgeous women he was associated with in the 
past.  Now, he's got a new girlfriend again.  One wonders if he'll ever get 
married.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote :


John, beauty is a fascinating topic from many angles. For example, I can 
totally see why people say that George Clooney is very handsome, etc. But there 
are other actors who I find far more attractive. Go figure!


On Saturday, April 5, 2014 2:49 PM, "jr_esq@..." <jr_esq@...> wrote:

 
Share,

As the old saying goes, "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder".  But I 
imagine, the artistry lies in combining different colors, along with the shades 
of dark and light.  I remember one painting style which makes the portrait look 
crystal clear.  I don't how it's done.  But I appreciate it's because I can't 
see that clearly without my glasses. :)



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote :


John, I understand what you're saying. Van Gogh is not one of my favorite 
artists and it has nothing to do with his mental
situation.  I am also mystified as to why some artists' works fetch such a high 
price. 
OTOH, I walk into an art gallery and immediately find the work that I 
absolutely love. Though I don't understand my preferences, I trust them. And 
enjoy...


On Saturday, April 5, 2014 1:40 PM, "jr_esq@..." <jr_esq@...> wrote:

 
Judy,

I'm still puzzled at how these art critics can proclaim the works of Van Gogh 
to be artistic genius.  From what I understand, when he painted his 
self-portrait, he was already insane.  And, if he were alive today, he'd be 
astonished that his paintings are now valued in millions of dollars.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :


I seriously doubt he'll sell them (he might give away a few to friends). The 
best of them will probably end up in his presidential library for the public to 
see.

In any case, if art collectors were to get hold of them, they'd be
valued only as curiosities. They're hardly works of artistic genius.



Salyavin,


It all depends if he can sell these artworks for millions during his lifetime, 
and if the art collectors in the future would value them like those of Van 
Gough and Monet.  But I would have to give him credit for expanding his 
creative talents after leading the US into expensive war campaigns in Iraq and 
Afghanistan.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jr_esq@...> wrote :


George W. Bush has recently displayed his works of art, as shown in the link 
below.  What do you think?

He's a better artist than he was a president.


http://news.yahoo.com/photos/portraits-by-george-w-bush-slideshow/








Reply via email to