Yes, the money people donate goes to: 1) the overhead for keeping the doors of the DLF open. 2) the TM teachers 3) the Maharishi Foundation
according to the Maharishi Foundation 990 form from 2012, https://bulk.resource.org/irs.gov/eo/2014_01_EO/04-3196447_990_201212.pdf https://bulk.resource.org/irs.gov/eo/2014_01_EO/04-3196447_990_201212.pdf ,TM instruction of students of any description (10-18, full-time undergrad/grad) was at 1,473 with revenues of $685,000. Expenses were $436,023. That works out to 2/3 of the money going to the teachers at nearly $300/student taught,and the rest going to the TMO. The DLF got some money for overhead and the teachers got 2/3 of the official fee and the TMO got the rest. If your point really IS that somebody paid for it at some point, that's just plain silly. Even when you donate blood to the Red Cross, somebody pays for it. Leaving aside the food you consumed to produce the blood in the first place, the Red Cross has to pay someone to refrigerate teh blood, transport the blood, etc. They have full-time employees (not volunteers) that handle large portions of this process because it is delicate work, not left to amateurs. They pay their executives a pretty decent wage ($6 million+), though not-so-much considering that they accept $3 billion+ a year in donations and so on. http://www.redcross.org/images/MEDIA_CustomProductCatalog/m16540911_FY12_ARC_990_Filed_with_IRS.pdf http://www.redcross.org/images/MEDIA_CustomProductCatalog/m16540911_FY12_ARC_990_Filed_with_IRS.pdf Complaining that "the money goes somewhere" without being specific about it, is silly. Money ALWAYS goes somewhere. There's overhead in keeping the doors open for large 501(c)(3) organizations. John Hagelin gets paid $36,000 as head of the Maharishi Foundation and another $37,000 as head of the David Lynch Foundation. https://bulk.resource.org/irs.gov/eo/2014_02_PF/20-0458302_990PF_201309.pdf https://bulk.resource.org/irs.gov/eo/2014_02_PF/20-0458302_990PF_201309.pdf Gail McGovern gets paid $591,000+ as president and CEO of the American Red Cross plus another $37,000 in the misc category of compensation. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote : I didn't say the people pay anything, I said the Lynch hucksters are always begging for donations - that money goes somewhere -------------------------------------------- On Fri, 4/18/14, LEnglish5@... mailto:LEnglish5@... <LEnglish5@... mailto:LEnglish5@...> wrote: Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why does TM seem to focus on losers? To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, April 18, 2014, 2:03 PM The people who learn TM via the David Lynch Foundation don't pay anything. People who receive food from the Red Cross don't pay for that food, but the people who donate money to the Red Cross did. You're picking a nit that only exists in your own mind. TM teachers get compensated for their time teaching TM, whether they teach through a TM center, or through the DLF. The national TM organization gets a cut of the money as well, though it isn't that much in the case of students. Currently, TM instruction costs $360 for school age kids, including full-time undergrad and grad students in college. A single TM teacher is responsible for teaching 300 students at a Quiet Time school, at least as far as compensation goes, though details of how local TM centers and/or local TM teachers are involved in the process are unclear to me (probably because they wing it depending on who is available when). If you look at the Maharishi Foundation, Inc Form 990 for 2012, when teaching students, TM teachers got 2/3 of the fee while the TM organization got 1/3. This works out to nearly $300/student. The 990 form for 2013 isn't available online yet, but they TMO is supposed to be so flush with cash this past year that they were able to drop the fees substantially and still pay all their bills. With the new fee schedule for 2014, I'm guessing that TM teachers will still get about $300/student while the TM organization will only get $60. L ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote : Incorrect Lawson - David Lynch doesn't offer shit for free. Why do you think he is ALWAYS begging for "donations" to FUND the programs? The TMO ALWAYS gets paid, no matter what. EVERYTHING they do is a scam to make money so they can live big. -------------------------------------------- On Fri, 4/18/14, LEnglish5@... <LEnglish5@...> wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why does TM seem to focus on losers? To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, April 18, 2014, 11:10 AM The David Lynch Foundation offers TM instruction for free to people in "at risk" groups, but the $2500 price tag was originally set by Maharishi to entice wealthy people and only wealthy people to learn TM. Weren't you complaining about how insanely high that price tag was? Seems to me that no matter how TM is marketed and for what price and for whichever group of people -the homeless, war refugees, students in El Barrio watching their cousins kill their cousins, or world famous actors and actresses, CEOs worth as much as small countries, etc.- you'll find a reason to kvetch. It's just an idea. YMMV. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote : One of the things I've noticed over the years is how many long-term TMers say things like, "I'd be dead if it weren't for TM," or "TM saved my life," or "TM cured me of my depression/anxiety/suicidal thoughts/mental illness/whatever." I've always found these claims difficult to relate to, because I didn't have anything to "cure" or "get over" when I first started TM. I had already left drugs behind me, having discovered them back when LSD was still legal and came in a bottle with Sandoz on the label. I did my time with them, enjoyed them *not* because they were an "escape from my problems" but because they enhanced an already-enjoyable life. But then I got tired of them, and even more tired of the scene surrounding them, and left them behind. I'm probably one of the only people here who didn't have to wait 15 days before starting TM. :-) I was also neither depressed nor suicidal. In fact, I was a pretty happy frood, and merely one who was looking for ways to become even happier. And for a time, TM presented what I was looking for, something to enhance a good life and help me to appreciate it even more. But then it became as boring and as stagnant as drugs had been, and with an even more stifling social scene, so I moved on again to other forms of meditation that worked better. But there seem to be any number of long-term TMers who don't look back on their TM experience this way. They seem to focus on what it enabled them to "get over" or "cure" or "get beyond," almost as if (almost) before TM they had been "broken" and TM had "fixed" them. This gets me to thinking about tent revival meetings in the South (which, of course, you can't help but attend a few of if you grow up in the South), in which the most fervent "believers" and most fundamentalist Bible-thumpers were ALL those who formerly were drunks or whores or thieves or something BAD. It's as if they don't feel they can adequately shout "I've been SAVED!" unless they feel they had a lot to be saved FROM. And *this* gets me to thinking about whether Maharishi always pitched TM to losers and people with problems and low self esteem because they become the best disciples. And *disciples* is what he was looking for. Think about it. Does the TMO really spend any energy trying to market TM to "regular people," who have few problems in life and are just looking to enjoy it more? They do not. They focus on People With Problems. Kids doing badly in school. Criminals locked away in prisons. Veterans with PTSD. Can't this be seen as a continuation of a long-standing trend to look for prospective new students among populations who are more likely to be easy to convert into True Believers and thus become disciples? It's just an idea. YMMV.
