I'm taking a short break from work, and thought I'd spend a few minutes on this 
sunny afternoon rapping about one of the things I like about some Buddhists 
I've met. Despite what Nabby says, I'm not actually a Buddhist myself. I 
couldn't be, because I don't even agree with the first of its Four Noble 
Truths. 

But I have met many Buddhists over the years (definitely *not* including the 
Rama/Fred Lenz guy, who only called himself a Buddhist), and one thing strikes 
me about the best of them is that they're pragmatic. 

The historical Buddha reputedly refused to be drawn into discussions of or 
arguments about the How and Why of things. He considered it a waste of time. 
His focus was on the What of things -- what is happening, right now, here, in 
the moment? In his view, it didn't really help to ponder How the events in this 
moment happened or Why they happened. Whatever you come up with will be only 
one view of the moment, and it won't really help you to deal with the moment 
itself. Better to focus, in his opinion, on the moment itself, and surfing it 
gracefully. 

I'm kinda drawn that way myself, which is why some aspects of Buddhism appeal 
to me. The cool Buddhists I've known don't really spend much time pondering 
theories of How or Why things happen. They just deal with the What of things, 
as they happen. 

And y'know, most of the time they're more *effective* at dealing with the 
moment than those who are off on the sidelines somewhere trying to figure out 
Why it happened or How. By the time they come up with an "explanation" that 
they can settle for, the moment has passed and they've lost their chance to 
deal with it at all. 

That's all. Now Nabby can go ballistic because someone mentioned "Buddhists."  
:-)

Reply via email to