Michael, you are just a funny guy. Your range of comprehension for the TM Organization is from bad to very bad. But, it's always such a hoot to see you give such significance to the points between those two. You are a wonderful student of the TMO.
And okay, I admit it, I got a big kick out the "potentate", Michael Jackson who was going to single handedly influence national elections if he found out a candidate practiced TM. I mean you've come off you big "win' getting your next door neighbor to stop the practice, and now you're ready for the national stage. Promise me you'll stick around here for a while! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote : you are talking junk. MMY and his sales organization were nowhere near perfect. Huckster and liars - still are. From: "steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, June 2, 2014 8:29 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A Little MIU Story Michael, Michael, this is so radical of you! That MMY and the TMO had shortcomings in your opinion? You are being so harsh on MMY and the TMO. You make it sound like they were neaaaarrrrly perfect, but just came up a little short. And those persnickety people who demanded perfection turned up their noses and went elsewhere. I see now. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote : It is only my opinion, but I think the number of people who were willing to go see Robin and to become part of his group is indicative of the shortcomings of both Marshy and his TMO - in other words, if either of them had been what they had claimed to be, no one would have looked twice at Robin. From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, June 2, 2014 9:44 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A Little MIU Story ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote : Wowzer. I don't think that's the issue Michael, this seeing of other teachers. That was not the problem the primary problem with RWC. Yes, if you became a follower, evidently there were consequences. But the situation there, as I understand it, was a frontal assault on the organization to usurp the authority of the existing teacher You had someone who felt he had a mandate to move the organization in a different direction. As I recall it, Robin wasn't out to set himself up as the Movement head or leader or anything else. He simply didn't agree with some things that were happening. (Because I was never interested in the TM org or the politics of it all and had never had aspirations to become a teacher the details of this were not important to me other than I liked his chuztpah and was attracted to the interesting vibe of the thing. And I wanted to see if I could tell if he was enlightened or not, get a chance to check out this outspoken guy.) He wanted to have a voice and let people know this and so a group formed around him once he made the move to FF and started giving seminars. Before that he simply lived in Victoria surrounded by a few Canadian TM teachers who still meditated, who took being a TM teacher seriously and who revered MMY but who also believed Robin to be enlightened and able to "help" them reach enlightenment by separating and recognizing the demonic from the divine within themselves. He became "enlightened" in 1976 and moved to FF in 1982 so there was a lot of time where there was simply a close-knit group of friends hanging out, eating meals together and getting the hell confronted out of them. It was around 1983 I believe, that the World Teacher Seminar emerged but he never had designs on taking over the TM Movement, I'm not sure he felt there was much hope for it by that time but he still loved MMY. Looky here. That's exactly what SSRS did. Was there a problem? No. Why? Because he set up a separate organization and made his pitch in a different venue. Did it work? Yes, many people went into his camp. Did it elicit the kind of reaction from the TMO that the RWC did? Not in the slightest. Does that indicate to you that the two situations were different? Probably not. To anyone else who doesn't have a stick up their butt about the TMO? Yes.
