Well Michael, "science" has determined that anything very technological
would have disappeared if it was over 5000 year old. Put that in your
chillum and smoke it. :-D
On 07/04/2014 10:29 AM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
and if there were civs that were more "advanced" than those of today,
and they left no record of sign and were superseded by much lesser
civs, then that "advanced" civ must not have been worth much to begin
with.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]"
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Friday, July 4, 2014 11:57 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 8,000 Year Old Indian City
Irradiated by Atomic Blast
On 07/04/2014 07:20 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>, <steve.sundur@...>
<mailto:steve.sundur@...> wrote :
I have always been fascinated by the idea that there were nuclear
weapons of some type back in ancient times.
There weren't any. This was in the Bronze age, the high water mark of
technology was poor quality swords and ploughs made from deer
shoulder blades. You won't be splitting any atoms with that stuff.
Jeez, they'd only just invented glazed pots when the Indus valley
civilisation collapsed!
Or so we think. I don't know why humanity thinks that current
civilization is the most advanced that has ever existed on this
planet. If so it is also the most narcissistic. :-D
