Contemporary mainstream science. There was a link to the article about
this posted on FFL a few years ago by Judy, I think.
Found the elephant's hoof yet? :-D
On 07/04/2014 11:19 AM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
Yeah, I would like to know what "science" he is referring to - perhaps
Eric Von Daniken type science? Or maybe Scientology type science? Or
TM type science? its all cut from the same cloth.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Friday, July 4, 2014 2:05 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 8,000 Year Old Indian City
Irradiated by Atomic Blast
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :
Well Michael, "science" has determined that anything very
technological would have disappeared if it was over 5000 year old.
Put that in your chillum and smoke it. :-D
So how come we have plenty of evidence that Bronze age man built
swords and simple homes and pottery but not that he had uranium
processing centrifuges?
The most sophisticated things that have turned up from the dawn of
man's history have been the batteries (powered by vinegar) that the
Egyptians used to electroplate gold. Amazingly clever for the age but
a good few steps away from splitting the atom.
I guess then we are talking about a more ancient civilisation that
disappeared without trace, but where were they? How come we have an
unbroken archaeological history from hunter gatherers, painting caves
and then the Iron age and beyond.
To find such a civilisation would be fabulous but their remains would
be huge, they would need to find ancient uranium mines just for
starters. I think if they exist we would have had glimpses from
somewhere. I live in hope for a major rewrite, the British Museum
exhibition about it would be fabulous...
On 07/04/2014 10:29 AM, Michael Jackson mjackson74@...
<mailto:mjackson74@...> [FairfieldLife] wrote:
and if there were civs that were more "advanced" than those of
today, and they left no record of sign and were superseded by much
lesser civs, then that "advanced" civ must not have been worth
much to begin with.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Bhairitu noozguru@... <mailto:noozguru@...>
[FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*Sent:* Friday, July 4, 2014 11:57 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 8,000 Year Old Indian City
Irradiated by Atomic Blast
On 07/04/2014 07:20 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>, <steve.sundur@...>
<mailto:steve.sundur@...> wrote :
I have always been fascinated by the idea that there were nuclear
weapons of some type back in ancient times.
There weren't any. This was in the Bronze age, the high water
mark of technology was poor quality swords and ploughs made from
deer shoulder blades. You won't be splitting any atoms with that
stuff. Jeez, they'd only just invented glazed pots when the Indus
valley civilisation collapsed!
Or so we think. I don't know why humanity thinks that current
civilization is the most advanced that has ever existed on this
planet. If so it is also the most narcissistic. :-D
