---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote :
Yeah, I would like to know what "science" he is referring to - perhaps Eric Von Daniken type science? Or maybe Scientology type science? Or TM type science? its all cut from the same cloth. I guess it would depend if it gets buried or not. And there's always exceptions, like the pyramids at Giza, they are the world's first large buildings and they would probably outlast anything we've built if our civilisation ended tomorrow. But if things get buried they will last. Take the fabulous remains discovered in Turkey at Göbekli Tepe http://www.gobeklitepe.info/ http://www.gobeklitepe.info/ Göbekli Tepe http://www.gobeklitepe.info/ Welcome to the presentation of the The World’s First Temple, Gobeklitepe … a pre-historic site, about 15 km away from the city of Sanliu... View on www.gobeklitepe.info http://www.gobeklitepe.info/ Preview by Yahoo against the usual run of things they were actually buried by the makers (we assume) and are pristine. If they had been left to the elements they would have disappeared by now as they are 12,000 years old! Because of the age there are all sorts of fantasies about them being the Garden of Eden - loads of it on the net - but we will probably never know who built it or why. But why a civilisation that could make nuclear weapons would disappear completely is beyond me, it would have to have been huge. You don't get the sort of technology required from spending most of the day farming, you need a proper scientific caste with money to burn, and all the technology involved would have to be painstakingly invented. It takes time and makes a mess, it took most of the population of Egypt working together hundreds of years just to make the pyramids. The idea of a nuclear early human culture is just ridiculous, we were too busy hunting rhino's to worry about much else in the sort of time they would have needed to be working out how atoms work. I can't believe I'm actually spending time thinking about it, I'm going out for a drink! From: salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 2:05 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 8,000 Year Old Indian City Irradiated by Atomic Blast ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote : Well Michael, "science" has determined that anything very technological would have disappeared if it was over 5000 year old. Put that in your chillum and smoke it. :-D So how come we have plenty of evidence that Bronze age man built swords and simple homes and pottery but not that he had uranium processing centrifuges? The most sophisticated things that have turned up from the dawn of man's history have been the batteries (powered by vinegar) that the Egyptians used to electroplate gold. Amazingly clever for the age but a good few steps away from splitting the atom. I guess then we are talking about a more ancient civilisation that disappeared without trace, but where were they? How come we have an unbroken archaeological history from hunter gatherers, painting caves and then the Iron age and beyond. To find such a civilisation would be fabulous but their remains would be huge, they would need to find ancient uranium mines just for starters. I think if they exist we would have had glimpses from somewhere. I live in hope for a major rewrite, the British Museum exhibition about it would be fabulous... On 07/04/2014 10:29 AM, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... mailto:mjackson74@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: and if there were civs that were more "advanced" than those of today, and they left no record of sign and were superseded by much lesser civs, then that "advanced" civ must not have been worth much to begin with. From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 11:57 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 8,000 Year Old Indian City Irradiated by Atomic Blast On 07/04/2014 07:20 AM, salyavin808 wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> mailto:steve.sundur@... wrote : I have always been fascinated by the idea that there were nuclear weapons of some type back in ancient times. There weren't any. This was in the Bronze age, the high water mark of technology was poor quality swords and ploughs made from deer shoulder blades. You won't be splitting any atoms with that stuff. Jeez, they'd only just invented glazed pots when the Indus valley civilisation collapsed! Or so we think. I don't know why humanity thinks that current civilization is the most advanced that has ever existed on this planet. If so it is also the most narcissistic. :-D
