That TM monkey on your back is doing some heavy whispering in your ear today, isn't he Stevie?
________________________________ From: "steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 9:19 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ah, Mother India Thank you for your rote response. And has India been in this poor shape for centuries, or is this your illusion? You seem to have a soft spot for Buddhism. Has Tibet been a shining example of spirituality over this same period? Forget about the period of Chinese occupation since that is relatively recent development. Once again, Richard has you well pegged as using any deficiency, or tragedy, for that matter, as a cudgel to win a religious debate, or more specifically, to find a MMY tie in. Maybe you're finally willing to own up to that! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote : The current state of India and the fact it has been in such shape for centuries is makes it clear that all the fabulous spiritual stuff you refer to is pretty much worthless on a practical level - except for those like yourself who love to live illusions. ________________________________ From: "steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 11:12 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ah, Mother India Here's the Yessir! part Michael, and that is how well Share has you pegged. Any negativity you can in some way ascribe to MMY, or weird association to MMY, trumps any of the faux humanitarian concerns you trumpet here on occasion. Because it falls right in your blind spot, you likely can't see it, but most others can. But aside from even that, as regards India, since you discount any element of spirituality in general, you are unable to separate out what many others see as one of the priceless gems India has to offer which are the realized spiritual teachers, most of whom exist completely under the radar. That does not even include teachers from the past, who founded major religions, or spiritual paths, including Buddhism, and maybe everything else except Christianity and Islam. Instead you focus only the myriad problems that exist there. Nay, you positively gloat about them since you think they reflect poorly on MMY, which then gives you some consolation. Yes, I know that is weird. You don't seem to realize that everyone else is fully aware of the problems that exist there. Others are just able to separate the milk and the water, to use a Vedic analogy. But, we all know what resentment does to see things in a balanced way. In the meantime do think you could spare us your selective concern for humanitarian causes? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote : Yessir! Land of the freakin' veda indeed! http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/10/opinion/sunday/the-youngest-are-hungriest.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=c-column-top-span-region®ion=c-column-top-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-top-span-region&_r=0 The Youngest Are Hungriest Why do eldest sons in India overshadow their siblings? Because they’re literally taller. View on www.nytimes.com Preview by Yahoo
