Re "Faster than light they must be relativistically moving backwards in time.":
 

 This stuff is beyond my pay grade but I understand that talk of backwards time 
travel is based on the "light cone" - zones in our past are "now" outside the 
ability of a light signal to reach us (see below).
 

 However, if neutrinos can exceed light speed then maybe that just means the 
angle at the cone's tip should be larger . . ?
 

 If that is not the case and neutrinos can send signals back into the past then 
ponder this:
 

 A mad scientist sets up an experiment in which a neutrino beam sends a signal 
into the past (say one second before). If a receiver picks up the signal sent 
from one second in the future it immediately shuts down the transmitter so 
ensuring that no signal will ever be sent.
 

 Mindfcuk.
 

 A contradiction. 
 

 A contradiction in *reality*!
 

 Help! The manifold of space-time is starting to unravel.
 

 Is anyone out there?
 

 

 

 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <s3raphita@...> wrote :

 Scientists said on Thursday they recorded particles travelling faster than 
light.
 Antonio Ereditato, spokesman for the international group of researchers, said 
that measurements taken over three years showed neutrinos pumped from CERN near 
Geneva to Gran Sasso in Italy had arrived 60 nanoseconds quicker than light 
would have done. 

 "We have high confidence in our results. We have checked and rechecked for 
anything that could have distorted our measurements but we found nothing," he 
said. "We now want colleagues to check them independently."

 
 If confirmed, the discovery would undermine Albert Einstein's 1905 theory of 
special relativity, which says that the speed of light is a "cosmic constant" 
and that nothing in the universe can travel faster.

 

 That's interesting, as are neutrinos themselves. If I recall correctly, they 
are forged as a byproduct of nuclear fusion inside stars,  the first odd thing 
about them is that they start travelling faster than light speed so they 
side-step the problem with acceleration. They are also massless which means 
they avoid having infinite mass - having none to start with - this also helps 
avoid destroying the universe as there are rather a lot of them. A few billion 
neutrinos from the sun pass through every square inch of your skin every second.
 

 Perhaps the most interesting thing about them is that if they really are 
travelling faster than light they must be relativistically moving backwards in 
time. This is because time slows down for the observer as you get close to 
light speed and stops when you reach it (not that you can) but anything going 
faster is - compared to our time frame - going backwards.
 

 This has been used as a plot device in hard sci-fi for decades, astrophysicist 
Gregory Benford wrote his Timescape novel featuring communication from the 
future via neutrino beams, as did John Carpenter in his movie Prince of 
Darkness (it was far and away the best bit of the film)..

 

 So the question is, how come these guys at CERN didn't know this? Do they not 
read sci-fi or was Benford's book transmitted back through time as a publicity 
stunt? Perhaps it was pure theory until now and they are justifiably excited in 
being able to prove it?
 

 Interesting stuff, but Einstein is safe, for now....




Reply via email to