On 08/26/2016 07:09 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :
On 08/26/2016 04:29 PM, authfriend@... <mailto:authfriend@...>
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>, <noozguru@...>
<mailto:noozguru@...> wrote :
On 08/26/2016 02:55 PM, authfriend@... <mailto:authfriend@...>
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>, <noozguru@...>
<mailto:noozguru@...> wrote :
(snip)
And neither does HuffPro because Clinton didn't mention
White Supremacist sites.
You mean "HuffPo."
Yup. Just a typo.
Of course they know what it is. What a silly thing to say!
Not according to that article.
Ooops, you're babbling again. What's "not according to
that article"?
I spelled it out but your reading comprehension seems to be
failing.
No, actually, what you wrote made no sense. Happens a lot
with you.
I *said* that the article is about white supremacist web
sites but Hillary did not refer to those but to Infowars.com
which *is not* a white supremacist site.
Well, that isn't what you said, but sadly it doesn't make any
more sense than what you did say. The HuffPo article isn't
just about white supremacist Web sites. It's about the
alt-right movement in general and its ties to Trump and his
campaign, as was her speech. The movement is centered around
white supremacy, but it's broader than that; Infowars.com
pretty much covers the spectrum. The HuffPo article explained
all that. You should really read it.
You are making broad assumptions which are incorrect. There is NO
MENTION of InforWars.com in the article.
(InfoWars, not InforWars.) Wow. Now you're hallucinating. I never
said the article mentioned InfoWars.com. Neither HuffPo nor
Hillary mentioned it. Hillary mentioned Jones's radio show but did
not mention the Web site.
Doesn't matter people will look up Alex Jones and find his web site
InfoWars.com.
What "broad assumptions" did I make that are incorrect?
/
//"The movement is centered around white supremacy, but it's broader
than that; Infowars.com pretty much covers the spectrum."
/It's known as "alternative media". Sounds like the Clinton kiddies
made up "Alt-Right" (sounds like a keyboard instruction). It is not
centered around white supremacy. That is an ignorant assumption.
I did a search to be sure. They don't know what they are talking
about and neither do you.
What did HuffPo get wrong?
They won't actually spend any time finding what Jones actually says. So
they will just make stuff up or miss quote him. Rachel Maddow on MSNBC
been caught doing this quite a bit and it is often hilarious. I don't
think Maddow has spent one minute watching a Jones video and is just
handed material by her young staff who have cherry picked things and
gotten it wrong. That's how the news business works these days.
A lot of these sites
A lot of which sites?
Bhairitu, when you're in a hole, STOP DIGGING.
Sites like Huffington Post. What the hell in your dimbo mind did you
think I meant?
are staffed by young folks who you would snap their ears if you
were their editor. They make naive broad assumptions and think
they are the "cats meow" because of the job they got.
