Again, not possible that you would know ahead of the conclusion of the investigation(s) in progress. (The operative phrase here is *in progress.*) Are you really trying to tell me that you are basing your conclusions on what the couple of people that have provided public testimony have said so far? Seriously? You are livin' in a dreamworld.....
These investigations, however, can be broken down into three categories: First, the intertwined Justice Department investigation, now led by a special counsel, into the ties between the Trump campaign and Russia and, reportedly http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/congress/article151565947.html?utm_content=buffer17664&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer, the possible cover-up. Second, the investigations led by the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, which are broadly looking at Russian intervention in the 2016 election. Third, the Senate Judiciary Committee and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee have been looking into former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn’s conduct specifically — and have recently expanded their inquiry to the circumstances surrounding former FBI Director James Comey’s firing. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : When I say *everyone* , I'm referring to the heads of the various agencies that have been leading the investigations and are in a position to know, that have testified. Clapper , Comey and a few others last week all said there is no evidence of Collusion or Obstruction by Trump and that he was *not* a target of their investigations.. Now of course CNN et al will find some anonymous source or sources that can't be questioned to say otherwise. From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 11:39 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Dismantling of Trump Again, not the case. "Everyone that has been involved" has not said any such thing. You do not know who all has been involved, because the investigations have not concluded. Have we heard from Bob Mueller yet, for example? Have we heard from the different congressional investigations that are *ongoing*? It seems that your information sources are divorced from reality and reflecting a one-sided illusion that you have bought into and are parroting here. I did not say at any time that I was certain there is a crime or that there isn't a crime that has been committed. What I said was that "more will be revealed" and that we do not know what the pattern of evidence will show, yet. I am not a lawyer and neither are you. Yes, we will see...... ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : I do know that everyone that has been involved has said there is no evidence of tampering or collusion. If you are so certain that there was a crime, what was the crime and what is the evidence? We've all been waiting to see or hear. From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 9:37 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Dismantling of Trump Again, you are coming to summary conclusions before the investigations have completed. You have no idea what the pattern of evidence will show in the end or what all the evidence is. You are just caught up in the grind of watching the daily "soap opera." ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : Comey never said Trump committed *obstruction of justice*. There is no evidence of obstruction, or collusion with the Russians as stated by Clapper, Comey and others that were interrogated by congress just last week. Zero, Zip, Nada! When Trump told Comey that he *hoped* he would let Flynn off or go, Comey took it as an instruction. That is his personal view which is purely subjective. The English language dictates that is a hope for an outcome. Not illegal or a dictate. If John is referring to Al Green as the congressman righting up articles of impeachment, the man is a fool like Maxine Waters and Sheila Jackson Lee. He doesn't even know what the charges would be.I would be surprised if the majority of his constituents graduated high school. From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 12:56 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Dismantling of Trump John, are you saying that in the public testimony "Comey just said that Trump committed obstruction of justice and a federal crime.?" You must not be talking literally. I'm pretty gosh darn positive he didn't say either such thing. However, I feel your pain. Here's a good article on impeachment. Impeachment does not mean removal. The likelihood that Trump will be removed through the impeachment process is slim to none, imho. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/12/15615066/impeachment-trump-process-history ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jr_esq@...> wrote : Emily, Comey has stated so in the article shown. I'm sure he knows how to present his evidence to support his point. Also, he has an ax to grind since he was fired by Trump. For the senators in the committee, it will be hard for them ignore the details of his testimony. All of these things are recorded and filmed which is available to all investigative reporters and all politicians. There's already a Democratic congressman who has crafted the steps needed to impeach Trump. It's only a matter of time when the snowball effect will take over the political climate in DC. And, it looks grim for Trump. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <emily.mae50@...> wrote : jr, Comey didn't say either of those things, I don't believe. We are a long ways from impeachment. There is no final conclusion yet on whether obstruction or collusion occurred. Trump has most definitely not been "virtually cleared of any wrong doing." Multiple investigations are still ongoing, yes? More will be revealed. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jr_esq@...> wrote : MD, Comey just said that Trump committed obstruction of justice and a federal crime which are punishable by impeachment. His testimony as an ex-FBI chief cannot be brushed aside easily by the Senators in the committee. This could become another Watergate for those who are looking for significance and historical comparison. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : John I'm sure you couldn't see how he was elected either. Trump has been virtually cleared of any wrong doing. He was never under investigation and there is no evidence of any collusion with the *Russians* and no evidence of obstruction of justice. I know this has got to be pissing the media and democrats off but these are the facts. From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2017 12:23 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Dismantling of Trump Comey's testimony today has caused a flurry of questions against Trump's personal and management style. He appears to be playing the "ratings" game to keep his job as president. I don't see any positive angle for Trump to save his job/gig at the White House. https://www.yahoo.com/news/live-coverage-james-comey-senate-testimony-153308399.html
