--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > OK, Judy, so you don't believe what you stated below, you're simply > > "reporting what some else has said" even though you state that it > > "seems as good an explanation as any" (Which begs the question, > > what other explanations for natural disasters have you read--I > > mean, other than DC Comics?) > > Sal, I am absolutely positive that you are not as > completely brainless as you are making yourself > sound here,
Is that what they call a backwards compliment? Or is it the famous passive-aggressivness Dr. Peter finds everywhere. > but I'm durned if I know *why* you'd > want to make yourself sound brainless. Or just straight out insulting. I get so confused. > > > > > > According to MMY, the root cause of natural disasters > > > > is stress, as you know. Reducing the levels of stress > > > > in the "atmosphere" will therefore reduce the number > > > > and severity of natural disasters. Seems as good an > > > > explanation as any for such a notion. > > In case you aren't just pretending to be stupid for some > unfathomable reason, I would vote for passive-aggressive-backwards-insulting-patronization. > read the above again and see if you > can figure out why your question at the top, in light of > what I actually wrote, is nonsensical. um, patronizing? is that what its called? Or Condescending? Damn, I get my insults all mixed up. Best left to professionals I guess. Hint: pay > particular attention to the last sentence. Ah, I know that one, really really I do. Call on me. Thats 'sarcasm.'! > > It's sure nice to know that none of the TMO silliness is part of > > your belief system, and that you base all your arguments on good, > > solid facts. > > I believe the only fact I cited in this specific > connection is what MMY has said about why he believes > mass meditation will reduce natural disasters. > > > I don't "believe" it, but I don't rule it out either. > > > > > > Oh. Yes, that sure clears things up. > > I understand that you're incapable of comprehending > the nature of skepticism, hmm, I would vote straight out insult on that one. > given that you yourself are > a confirmed skeptopath. another point in the straight out insult bin. Too bad; that is rather > limiting. hmm, snide skeptiticism combined with patronization? Did I get it right? Did I get it right? > > Tell you what, Judy. I'll take a course on reading comprehension > > if you agree to take one in Basic English. > > No, sorry, my English is fine. But you desperately > need some serious tutoring. Rudeness? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
