On Jan 23, 2006, at 11:19 AM, authfriend wrote:
Substance M was not used as an example of a marketing ploy.
Typical Judy response, play dumb. This is not what I was referring to--I was referring to your admission that you accepted that TM was a form of 'technology of the Unified Field'. If that is your belief, why should I want to try to change that? I accept that this is your belief. With response such as these, why should I waste my time? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- [FairfieldLife] Re: The great lie of Quantum P... Patrick Gillam
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The great lie of Quantum Physics an... Vaj
- [FairfieldLife] Re: The great lie of Quantum Physics and Co... authfriend
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The great lie of Quantum Physi... Vaj
- [FairfieldLife] Re: The great lie of Quantum Physics and Co... authfriend