--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bhagwan_goose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My point exactly. As you may have seen in my original post back to > > > peter (to which you responded) if procession does not imply the sun > > > rising from different directions, for example from the west 13,000 > > > yrsr agos (half a precessional cycle), then why and how does it > > > make SV invalid in the long run -- as Peter has argued. > > > > I don't think your mental model is quite right,
> > Not the first time its been off. :) Gee thanks. :) But its certainly true. > > > but I'm not sure exactly how it's off, so I don't > > know how to help you correct it. > > Do you therefore feel Peter's model is correct? If so, can you explain why? Precession is clearly real. The issue is does it effect the sun's directional relationship to buildings over long spans of time. It does not appear to. So why does precession invalidate SV as Peter argued? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
