--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bhagwan_goose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > My point exactly. As you may have seen in my original post back to > > > > peter (to which you responded) if procession does not imply the sun > > > > rising from different directions, for example from the west 13,000 > > > > yrsr agos (half a precessional cycle), then why and how does it > > > > make SV invalid in the long run -- as Peter has argued. > > > > > > I don't think your mental model is quite right, > > > > > Not the first time its been off. :) > > Gee thanks. :) But its certainly true. > > > > > but I'm not sure exactly how it's off, so I don't > > > know how to help you correct it. > > > > Do you therefore feel Peter's model is correct? If so, can you > explain why? > > Precession is clearly real. The issue is does it effect the sun's > directional relationship to buildings over long spans of time. > It does not appear to. So why does precession invalidate SV as Peter > argued? >
It changes by a few degrees over time. The 1 degree per 72 years sounds off. Perhaps 1 second of arc per 72 years? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
