--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, I have a similar take on this,

But you said you thought Guru Dev's take was "entirely
contrary" to that of MMY.  I was suggesting it wasn't
that different.

 but have you looked at the 
> Shastras? Phew!!!! Also, Guru Dev extols not only the Shastras but 
> their author, holding him to have supernatural sight.

Did that view of the author also come from a book,
or was it intuitive on Guru Dev's part, do you think?


 Well it might 
> interest FFLers to check the biographical profile of the author, 
but 
> really!!
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason" 
> > <premanandpaul@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Well Rick, here is a stream-of thinking answer to your 
> suggestion. 
> > > It is apparent when reading Guru Dev's satsangs that he was 
> totally 
> > > sold on the idea of everyone living by the Shastras. So it 
might 
> be 
> > > interesting to take a raincheck on that area. He really was 
quite 
> > > adamantly against arbitrariness - caste was important as was 
> ritual.
> > >
> > > He was highly unimpressed with science.
> > > He had a downer on Westerners.
> > > He seemed to have absolute belief in fatalism.
> > > He didn't seem to believe that just doing some worship or
> > > meditation was enough, he believed that living by the Shastras 
> was 
> > > totally necessary (sorry to come back to that first point - but 
> it 
> > > is so recurrent as to be inescapable).
> > >
> > > Okay, where were we. Oh yes, he most certainly was completely 
> sold 
> > > into the idea of rebirth and all the rest of Hinduism's basic 
> > > beliefs, thus re-enforcing the idea that all things Hindu are 
> right 
> > > and fine and dandy. But often he makes it clear that he is
> > > repeating accepted wisdom.
> > >
> > > BUT that is entirely contrary to what I understand MMY has been 
> > > saying. He has encouraged people to believe that being 
> enlightened 
> > > will give up the answers. i.e. it is consciousness not books 
that 
> > > give the knowledge.
> > 
> > Would Guru Dev have disagreed that consciousness is
> > the ultimate source of knowledge?  I have trouble
> > believing that he would have.
> > 
> > Perhaps what he was doing by emphasizing the shastras
> > was giving his students/followers something to live
> > by *until* they could depend on consciousness for 
> > knowledge.
> > 
> > And if that's what he was telling them, he would have
> > to live by the shastras' rules himself, would he not,
> > to set an example?
> > 
> > MMY actually does somewhat the same thing, by giving
> > some general behavioral recommendations and then
> > telling TMers to follow the scriptures of their religion,
> > and/or the laws of the land, and/or the advice of their
> > elders, if they are in doubt about the right thing to
> > do.  He doesn't specify a particular set of scriptures
> > or laws because he wants to reach people of all religions
> > (and no religion) and all nations.
> > 
> > > It is likely Guru Dev lived an exhalted inner existence and was 
> > > incredibly at peace with himself. It is implicit in everything 
> MMY 
> > > says about his guru that we are to take it that he was 
> enlightened.
> > > However, if one lives purely by rules, Shastras and convention 
> and 
> > > never makes decisions for oneself, in any real sense, the point 
> of 
> > > wanting enlightenment gets lost. People want to feel free of 
the 
> > > interminable rules and regulations, that's a big part of why 
they 
> > > take a dive into the peace to be found beyond thinking.
> > 
> > On the other hand, I would suspect that once one
> > attains complete inner freedom, having to follow
> > external laws and rules isn't much of a pinch.
> > 
> > Presumably we want to become enlightened not so we
> > can be free of rules, but so rules can no longer
> > impinge on our sense of freedom, which has become
> > absolute and infinite.
> > 
> >  
> > > There must be something there worth discussing, other than the 
> > > confused way I have laid out the ideas.
> >
>







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to