--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > I'm pointing out that it's > > nonsensical for you to ask *me* to prove the experts > > were right in thinking there were anomalies significant > > enough to warrant investigation. > > If all you are saying inall of this is the experts thoughtthere were > anomalies significant enough to warrant investigation" fine, no > disagreemnt. I have said nothing to contradict this obvious point.
That's all I've ever said. Why have you been arguing with me if you agree? > My repeated point, quite different from the above, is that no > investigation, article or person to my knowledge has shown any > analysis that the trading deviated from the long-run norm in > statistical significant way. Mark Meredith just said the data was easily available-- which is what I was saying as well, and you were denying-- and was clearly statistically significant. > We have such a huge semantic gap here, further discussion seems > unproductive. Interesting how you always seem to manage to create these "huge semantic gaps" that make further discussion unproductive when you've been shown to be embarrassingly wrong. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
