--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <no_reply@> > wrote: > <snip> > > Can you provide any data, or any statistical analysis, or cites to > > such, to support your opinion that a) there were statistically > > anomolous (that is, sigma 4-5 events, using 90-360 day series) > > trades in airline, oil or gold stocks or options, in the week (s) > > prior to 9/11? > > It isn't my "opinion" that there were trading anomalies; > it's a matter of public record. I provided cites to > news reports on what they were.
But just because someone who writes a newspaper story "says" something and comes to a certain conclusion, Judy, doesn't make it so. And those of us -- including you -- who have been around the TMO and MMY know how the media can and does misinterpret and misstate things and come to wrong and different conclusions based on their misperceptions. So you citing a newspaper report -- after you've made a statement in your own words declaring it as fact -- is not enough. Either YOU back up what you state yourself or back away from it and retract it. You've done neither when anon called you on it. > If you disagree with > the newspaper reports, No, he's disagreeing with YOU. YOU'RE the one making a claim. Directing someone to a newspaper article is NOT an acceptable way of backing yourself up. Don't believe everything you read in the paper or see on TV. Think for yourself. > it's up to you to prove they > were wrong (and that the financial institutions all > over the world that were the source of the newspaper > reports were wrong). > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
