>
> > > > > > > I once posted a commentary that author and scientist
> > > > > > > (he's a
> > > > > > > Harvard grad) Michael Creighton had made on global
> > > > > > > warming.
> > > > > > > Putting aside what you or I may feel about the issue,
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > facts or the arguments of the piece weren't important
to
> > > > > > > Billie. Instead, Billie came out with fists swinging
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > attempted to...demonize and discredit the author!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Whoops, there goes Shemp, lying a blue streak again.
> > > > >
> > > > > BTW, I predict that if Barry responds, he'll "remember"
> > > > > the discussion exactly the way Shemp does.
> > > > >
> > > > > Folie a deux, anyone?
> > > >
> > > > Barry's not reading your stuff. He has to read a response to
> > > > you before he responds...
> > >
> > > Lawson. Why would Barry have to read a post of mine
> > > to know what's in a post from Shemp?
> > >
> > > My point is that he'll back Shemp up, even though he
> > > knows Shemp's lying, because Shemp is attacking me.
> >
> > Politics is always interesting to watch...
>
> So is insanity.
>
> Like the kind of person who has to imagine that
> people are "attacking" her and "lying" about her
> so that she can avoid dealing with the fact that
> they're saying what they really believe.
Just as I predicted.
No, in fact Shemp was lying. If you go back
and read the exchange he's referring to, you'll
see that quite clearly. But you won't, because
that would cause <gasp> COGNITIVE DISSONANCE,
and we can't have that, can we?
> It's always astounded me how absolutely *incapable*
> this person is of hearing any view of herself other
> than her own. If anyone has a different view of
> who she is, it's always because they didn't read
> her perfect language properly, or because they're
> LYING. The possibility that they're saying what
> they really believe never enters the equation.
And that's also a lie, sorry. You were on alt.m.t
with me for 10 years. You know that isn't so.
It's pretty much so of *you*, because you read
into what I say what you would like me to have
said so you can take a shot at me; and of course
that's also the case with others you argue with.
You've been called on it more times than I can
count, by me and many, many others.
> Recently she did this with pretty much the
> entirety of FFL. Several people...I counted
> eight in all...told her what they honestly thought
> of her and her abusive tactics. What *she* thought
> happened is that a few people had LIED about her
> and the rest were somehow "taken in."
Not what I said, nor what I thought happened.
Perfect example. Thanks for proving my point.
>
> Like I said, insanity. I'll let her act it out
> with Shemp by herself, thanks...
>
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
| Maharishi university of management | Maharishi mahesh yogi | Ramana maharshi |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
