authfriend wrote:

>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>wrote:
>  
>
>>--- authfriend wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>*Nobody* is against wiretapping suspected
>>>terrorists, domestic or otherwise.  
>>>      
>>>
>>What do the Bushies have against getting a court 
>>order under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance 
>>Act? In all the kerfuffle, I've yet to hear why they 
>>don't want to follow the process already set up 
>>for such stuff.
>>    
>>
>
>They claim it takes too long, but that's a crock;
>they're explicitly allowed to wiretap without a
>warrant for 48 hours (or is it 72?) exactly so 
>that getting a warrant won't impede an urgent
>investigation.
>
>The *real* reason is they don't want to have any
>restrictions at all; they want to be able to 
>wiretap anybody at any time whether they have
>grounds for suspicion or not.  It's the Imperial
>Presidency, or the "Unitary Executive," as they
>call it.  To hell with checks and balances; that's
>for sissies.
>
Exactly and I can't figure out why these "commoner" rightists would 
support Bush as it is against their own best interests.  At least some 
of his former supporters have wised up.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to