--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "rmy108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If Guru Dev told Maharishi not to teach, why would Satyanand have > joined Maharishi, knowing full well that the whole TM movement was > against his masters wishes. Its one thing if Maharishi disobeyed > Guru Dev, but its another thing that two disciples (MMY and > Satyanand) would disobey Guru Dev's instructions. It doesn't make > sense to me that this could happen and therefore seems to take away > from the credibility of this idea that has been floating around that > Guru Dev told Maharishi not to teach.
Not to mention Swami Shatananda and Swami Vishnudevananda, both of whom were senior to MMY in the ashram heirarchy AND were officially head of the Shankaracharya order according to MMY. That's some kind of influence that clerk managed to get over some senior monks, eh? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
