--- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > It had its moments... > > > > > > > > Oh really? Where? :-) > > > > > > > > > ...and no-one knows if this was a final cut, > or a > > > > > rejected take. > > > > > > > > This was heavily edited footage made from > several > > > > different takes (you can tell because of the > changing > > > > light conditions), taken from many different > camera > > > > angles. > > > > > > > > > You guys LOVE to pre-judge, doncha? > > > > > > > > And, as I said before, you LOVE to make > excuses > > > > for anything TM-related, doncha? > > > > > > > > If that's not what's happening, answer the > first > > > > question above. Exactly WHAT did you feel was > a > > > > good "moment" in this piece of crap? > > > > > > Some of the expressions and meaningful glances > > > between the two women looked very real-to-life > > > rather than Hollywood emotions. > > > > In all seriousness, Lawson, if their interactions > > struck you as "real-to-life," you're ready to join > > Nablus in accepting the pronouncements of Creme. > :-) > > > > Stop embarrassing yourself, dude. The only reason > > you are cutting this stuff any slack is because > > Lynch is a well-known TMer. If he were anything > > else you'd be as amazed at its awfulness as every- > > one else here has been. And if he were a prominent > > > Buddhist, you'd be saying that the footage proves > > that Buddhist meditation techniques make the mind > > confused and lazy. > > > > Sparaig's idea of real-to-life dialog, devoid > > of fake Hollywood emotion: > > > > Zombiewoman1: Will you give me a sip of your > drink? > > > > Zombiewoman2: Sure. You can have the rest. > > > > :-) :-) :-) > > > > The hilarious thing is that now, having "stood up" > > for Lynch and put his cred on the line, Sparaig's > > actually going have to see the movie and sit > through > > almost three hours of this mindnumbingly awful > pap, > > three hours of his life he'll never get back. > > > > Are you trying to show your lack of reading > comprehension? I said nothing about dialog. I > said the meaningful glances between the two women > were more true-to-life than much of > the emotive stuff that traditionally comes out of > Hollywood. "Meaningful glances" doesn't > mean "talking out loud." I've always regarded much, not all, of Lynch's work as "film school crap" Lynch has a very creepy aspect to him that can be manifested in his films. Ever seen "Ereaser Head" ? It is a disgusting, grossly over rated sick film. The clip in discussion is just more pretentious film nonsense. Notice the chromakey effect (or whatever it's called now in digital film making, it's been a few decades!)with the male actor? What's that for? I just don't like his work. I see Lynch as quite disturbed. Something is "off" in his psyche. > > > > > > > > To subscribe, send a message to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Or go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ > and click 'Join This Group!' > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
