--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor" > > <uns_tressor@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Counterbalancing electromagnetic radiation in Maharishi > > Sthapatya > > > > Veda buildings > > > > Global Good News 10 February 2007 > > > > In Maharishi Sthapatya Veda, the ancient Vedic science of > > > > architecture and city planning in harmony with Natural Law, a > > new > > > > angle has recently come to light: the issue of electricity. > > > > Electricity is a great blessing, on which everyone depends in > > many > > > > ways, but it should be handled with due care. Global Good News > > is > > > > alerting our readers to the possible health hazards and what can > > be > > > > done to avert them. > > > > > > And don't build homes near railway lines. Some electric locomotives > > > pull 2000amp at three phase (415v). That will give a lot of gauss. > > > Uns. > > > > > I can appreciate the intentions of this article to raise the general > > awareness of the pervasive and chaotic nature of electromagnetic > > radiation, and possibly no one would pay any attention if it weren't > > written in such an uncompromising fashion. However my house when I > > lived in the DC area was located near a green belt with high voltage > > transmission towers running through it, and despite that I had some > > of my best individual spiritual experiences there, and remain in > > pretty much perfect health. So, something to be aware of, and > > perhaps take into consideration for long-term urban planning, but > > nothing to worry about. > > > > ++ Do you think it is a one size fits all or, maybe a case by case > situation. > Should the whole issue be any concern of the "invincibles" > In my expierience of working with welding for the last fifty years > with being near cables with either DC or AC power in them, I don't > think it has contributed greatly to my present level of brain damage. > Thanks. N. >
How's your BC coming along? It is QUITE possible that exposure to EM radiation can effect the brain in subtle ways. There are already therapies where this effect is used to counteract various kinds of behavioral/emotional disorders, but these are carefully (within some ill-defined definition of the word) administered doses and frequences, not some random, high-level, and ongoing dose. There's also plenty of evidence that using cell phones changes the physical activity of the brain, at least DURING the use of the phone. The scare over the possibilty of brain cancer due to cell phone use is because the engineer who invented them died of an exteremly rare form of brain cancer on the side of the head where he was keeping his proto-type phone. Motorola rethought the engineering of the entire project and reduced cell-phone EM emmissions *drastically* in order to bring the possibility of brain cancer caused by cell phones down to the margin of error for the studies that test for such things. If you look at the brain imaging studies of little kids while they're using cell phones, the physical changes spread throughout their entire brain, whereas with adults, the effect is localized so most scientists (outside Motorola's of course) recommend that little kids use cell phones very seldom if at all. Regardless, the scientific truth is that there is no such thing as a minimum dose of radiation: ALL radiation doses are accumulative over time, and to dismiss worries about more subtle and difficult to detect side-effects than brain cancer due to cell phones and other EM sources, is, well, silly. That said, I still use my computer, and I use a base-station wireless phone and I'm willing to use someone ELSE's cell phone when it is handed to me, but I don't walk around chatting with people the way some do and I'm happy that I'm not living beneath a high- voltage power line.
