--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On May 9, 2007, at 10:39 AM, authfriend wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > > wrote: > >> > >> On May 9, 2007, at 10:08 AM, Rick Archer wrote: > > <snip> > >>> Are you kidding? Maharishi has a lousy reputation in India. > >>> If he's remembered at all, he's thought of as a businessman. > >>> Amma and SSRS are the best-known living gurus, and they have > >>> stellar reputations, as do a number of dead ones, such as > >>> Ramana Maharshi, Yogananda, Aurobindo, etc. > >> > >> Actually, I thought he had been banned from India on account of > >> financial shenanigans. Same thing over here. > > > > That wouldn't make any sense. If there are folks > > (the state or individuals) who think he's swindled > > them, they'd *want* him to come to their countries > > so they could prosecute or sue him. As long as he > > stays away, they can't get at him. > > OK, maybe I should have said, that he can't go to those places on > account of subpoenas he'd get if he did. That's true, that they > would want him to come here and maybe they do, but as long as he > doesn't they apparently can't subpoena him. > > That's what I've heard, Judy.
Yup, that's my understanding too.