--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Hmm. I'm not sure there is a question in the above, so much as 
> a seeking of thoughts and opinion. 

Hi, John. I'll offer some thoughts and opinons,
which should be regarded as nothing more. I speak
as a former TM teacher, but one who has not been
part of the TM organization since the late 70s 
and who has been involved in other forms of 
meditation and spiritual practice in the years
since. 

> Is the mantra used of importance? 

I know that others here will disagree with me, but
I personally feel that the mantra has pretty much
the importance that the meditator brings to it. 
If the tradition stresses the privateness and the
specialness of the mantra and the way it's trans-
mitted, naturally the meditator is going to feel
that the mantra (and the choice of which mantra)
is of great importance indeed.

On the other hand, I've spent some time around
groups in which mantras are handled in a more 
cavalier fashion. For example, during a dharma
talk a teacher might throw out a particular man-
tra and invite the people in the audience to 
meditate using it. No ceremony, no pomp, no
circumstance, more Joe Friday-like in Dragnet,
"Just the mantra, ma'am." Naturally, if you 
learned to meditate using a mantra you received
in such a fashion, you probably wouldn't have
the same near-sacred regard for it as someone
who learned, say, TM, might have for their mantra.

As to whether the mantra "works" any better as
a vehicle of meditation in either case, I have 
to say that I have seen no evidence that there
is any difference at all. I have known people
who received a "cavalier" mantra thrown out in
a public lecture and have transcended deeply on
it immediately, and consistently afterwards.
And I have known people who have received a 
"pomp and circumstance" mantra and who are still
not sure, after decades, that they've ever 
transcended at all.

So my opinion (and that's all it is) is that the
choice of mantra and the manner in which it is
transmitted are not nearly as important as some
traditions make it out to be.

> If so, why? If not, why?! 

Dealt with above.

> Do there by any chance exist other non mantra-based, non-
> religious, 'aimless' meditations? 

There are certainly many forms of non-mantra-
based meditation. For example, Zen meditations
based on following the breath, many different
forms of mindfulness meditation, etc. As for 
how "non-religious" they might be, that would
be up to you and your definition of "religious."
For example, I have spent a number of years 
studying Buddhist thought, and I regard it as 
a philosophy, and very much NOT a religion, but
your mileage may vary. 

As for "aimless," there are forms of meditation
that are as effortless as TM, but I wouldn't call
any of them (nor would I call TM) "aimless." They
all have *somewhat* of an "aim," and a method of
achieving that aim. Pure aimlessness, in my book,
would be akin to daydreaming, which I do not 
personally feel is the same thing as meditation.

> Are my thought processes described above flawed? If 
> so, why and how?

I don't think your thought processes are flawed,
but I suspect you'll encounter a few people here
who might suggest that they are. Don't be too
concerned about it; they've been telling me that
my thought processes are flawed for years now,
and their comments plus a Euro will buy ne a 
coffee at the corner cafe.  :-)

I still think that the basic TM technique has value,
not the least of which being that it is easy to
learn and to practice. And I received much value
from practicing it, and know that many other people
have as well. I walked away from TM not because of
any real problems I had with the TM technique, but
because the TM movement was not offering me what
I was looking for in a spiritual sadhana. 

So I think that you're on the right track by asking
questions, and not settling for "pat" answers to
them. What you end up deciding is your own personal
concern, and I would not offer any advice as to what
you should do, other than to say that 40+ years med-
itating have convinced me of its value, no matter
which method of meditation you practice. Good luck
on figuring out which method suits you best.

Unc



Reply via email to