--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > <shempmcgurk@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > _Alarmist global warming claims melt under scientific > > > scrutiny :: > > > > > CHICAGO > > > > > > SUN-TIMES :: Other Views_ > > > > > > (http://www.suntimes.com/news/otherviews/450392,CST-EDT- > > > > > REF30b.article) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I already posted a link to this article. > > > > > > > > > > Judy's response? It's totally meaningless because > ExxonMobile > > > funds > > > > > the institute where the author works. > > > > > > > > > > > > Heartland Institute has received $791,500 from ExxonMobil since > > > 1998. > > > > > > The Heartland Institute created a website in the Spring of 2007, > > > www.globalwarmingheartland.org, which asserts there is no > scientific > > > consensus on global warming and features a list of experts and a > > list > > > of like-minded think tanks, many of whom have received funding > from > > > ExxonMobil and other polluters. [...] > > > > > > Walter F. Buchholtz, an ExxonMobil executive, serves as > Heartland's > > > Government Relations Advisor, according to Heartland's 2005 IRS > Form > > > 990, pg. 15. > > > http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2005/363/309/2005-363309812- > > 0295fbb2-9.pdf > > > > > > The Heartland Institute formerly sponsored and hosted > > > www.climatesearch.org, a web page ostensibly dedicated to > objective > > > research on global warming, but at the same time presenting > heavily > > > biased research by organizations such as the American Petroleum > > > Institute as an FAQ section. > > > > > > http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=41 > > > > > > > SO WHAT? > > > > > > Did you read the article? It was, mostly, a compendium of > references > > > to published articles in the leading scientific journals that > refuted > > > the global warming position. > > > > > > Are all these journals and all the authors of those pieces ALSO > in > > > the pocket of ExxonMobile? > > > > > > Cherry picking isolated stories to promote one's biased claims pales > > in comparison to the overwhelming massive collective evidence > > indicating the reality of global warming. > > > > > > > There IS NO "overwhelming massive collective evidence indicating the > reality of global warming". > > That's just something Al Gore said or that you read in the media.
The fact that you are astonishingly uninformed is your fault, not mine. > > The fact that the author of > > the article works for a known paid Big Oil shill makes your case > > laughable when you expect to be taken seriously. > > >
