--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2007, at 9:59 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:
>
> > > Yet this is just new age speculation. The tradition itself is
> > very
> > > clear on what "UC", videha-mukti, is and it is not a transitional
> > state.
> > >
> > You must be misintepreting that. Its a very subtle difference
> > between Brahman and UC. Each could be mistaken for the other. I'll
> > trust my experience over a tradition any day.:-)
>
>
> Then feel free to stop using the continuous tradition's lingo for
> your own experiences. :-)
>
I use the term UC as explained by MMY. I haven't yet heard him say
whether or not the state was meant to be permanent. My experience is
that it isn't.:-)
