--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <drpetersutphen@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > --- boo_lives <boo_lives@> wrote:
> > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister
> > > <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > IMO, he looks a bit sad or worried in most
> > > > of these pics:
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/photogallery.htm
> > > > 
> > > > I guess he knew what the world would have to go
> > > through
> > > > during the 20th century.
> > > >
> > > Or how MMY would start selling supernormal powers
> > > and Enlightenment at
> > > $1 million a pop to spiritual gullible americans,
> > > all proceeds going
> > > into an offshore account in the jersey islands named
> > > Brahmananda
> > > Saraswati Trust, which finances real estate
> > > development and lavish
> > > lifestyles of the varma/srivasta clans.
> > 
> > Slam dunk!!
> > 
> I guess I never figured that Guru Dev is that weak, blind and stupid-
> - 
> 
> That a saint who could make himself dynamically known to many after 
> his bodily death, who apparently organized a massive yagya to end 
> world war two, who manifested money out of the ether, who lived 
> unaided in the forest from the age of nine, would be incapable of 
> using his highly developed intuition to pick a worthy successor to 
> spread his message, one who he even provided with the mantras useful 
> for the world, on his deathbed? 
> 
> Of all those who he could of chosen, at his pinnacle of wisdom and 
> popularity as Shankaracharya of the North, of all of those attracted 
> to him, he choses someone who is greatly flawed, to destroy and cast 
> doubt on all of his work? 
> 
> Sorry, but I ain't buyin' it.:-)
>
There is no evidence that GD choose MMY to be his successor - tmers
believe that based on what MMY has said not anything objective. 
There's a huge decades long controversy over who GD's official jyotir
math successor was, where there is some record, and there's no record
at all regarding MMY.  GD did not give MMY tm mantras - as has been
documented MMY started teaching TM in india with the mantra raam given
to everyone, later changed to bij mantras, and changed the criteria
for selecting bij mantras at least a couple times.  The deathbed story
is believed by tmers and makes a great dramatic story.  You can
believe whatever you want, as long as you understand you're using your
own spiritual movement's beliefs/stories/myths to support your
argument, which doesn't have much weight on those who aren't a part of
it.  Every guru with a marketing orientation has a story about how he
is the official successor/reincarnation of/avatar of/ etc. of some
prior esteemed guru.  Anti-tm people from GD's ashram have their own
stories about how GD warned the ashram about MMY's ambition and to
keep him on the business side and out of the teaching side of the
ashram, and how MMY fooled with the will, etc.  That's their stories -
 they have the same objective weight as TM TB stories.

MMY certainly has been successful in drawing in people to meditation
and in raising money.  Still a pretty large group in ffld doing his
thing.  I don't know if that says anything about GD or what he would
think about it.  

I don't know much about GD from non TM sources.  He appears to have
practiced a tradition called shri vidya.  My personal opinion is that
GD's true lineage is being upheld by someone trained and selected
while GD was in the forest, not while in his public formal role as a
religious ashram leader.




Reply via email to