--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sep 17, 2007, at 11:20 AM, authfriend wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sep 17, 2007, at 10:24 AM, authfriend wrote: > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 16, 2007, at 11:51 PM, Bronte Baxter wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I think it dismisses way too much to reduce the gods to > > > > qualities > > > > > > of consciousness. In the sense that we are all just qualities > > of > > > > > > consciousness, I suppose you could say that's true. But in the > > > > > > practical sense, the gods are unique individuals, no different > > > > that > > > > > > way than a flesh-and-blood person. They simply exist on a > > > > dimension > > > > > > that is vibrating faster than this one and therefore not > > visible > > > > to > > > > > > the eye. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just glancing over it, it smells of TMO reductionism. > > > > > > > > Better clean out your nose, Vaj. It's not just a > > > > TMO notion by any means. > > > > > > Nor did I indicate it was. > > > > Well, yes, you did. You said "It smells of TMO > > reductionism," not "It smells of the reductionism > > that's been a popular trend since at least > > Aurobindo, but possibly a Vaishnavite trend which > > is much older." > > Uh, no I did not say it was ONLY from the TMO (nor > did I intend to).
Not after I challenged you, certainly. > Stop trying to twist people intentions as if you knew what > they were. Yeah, it's a drag when somebody sees right through your intentions, ain't it?
