David Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Which is a remarkable achievement. How could you present a case > without having made any assumptions? Do you therefore have all the > facts in the Universe at your disposal and therefore do not need to > rely on any values, ethics or assumptions to guide your actions? This > would mark you as far different from the rest of us poor mortal > humans that are given only finite abilities to assess reality. ;-)
Please take this subthread to news:alt.philosophy.tactical or drop it - it is off-topic here. As far as I saw, David Berry seems to have built a strawman and claimed it is Tom Chance, which turned the debate sour. After that, there's far too many smirking smilies and have-you-stopped- denying-you-beat-your-wife-yet-style questions for anything good to come from this. Like the subject says, it is now Silly with a capital S. Regards, -- MJ Ray - see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html North End, Lynn, Norfolk, England Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request _______________________________________________ fc-uk-discuss mailing list fc-uk-discuss@lists.okfn.org http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/fc-uk-discuss
