On 03/10/2016 08:34 AM, Jens Maurer wrote: > On 03/10/2016 01:41 PM, John Spicer wrote: >> I’m wondering whether some of these should be updated values of existing >> macros. >> >> For example, capture of this and constexpr lambdas *could* be an update of >> __cpp_lambdas. > > Agreed, sounds more reasonable to me.
That means that you can't test for support of one without the other, but I guess that's OK. Jason _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
