On 03/11/2016 12:58 AM, Nelson, Clark wrote: > Does anyone feel that the availability of constexpr lambda would be > better indicated through __cpp_lambdas than through __cpp_constexpr?
No. > I think it would be perfectly reasonable to bump __cpp_constexpr again > for lambdas. Fine with me. > But I'm still leaning towards having a separate macro for > capturing *this, at least in part for consistency with > __cpp_init_capture. Agreed. Jens _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
