> On 03/10/2016 01:41 PM, John Spicer wrote: > > I’m wondering whether some of these should be updated values of > existing macros. > > > > For example, capture of this and constexpr lambdas *could* be an > update of __cpp_lambdas. > > Agreed, sounds more reasonable to me.
I can see how the ability to add "constexpr" to a lambda might be considered just a tweak. But, for example, we already have __cpp_generic_lambdas. A new kind of capture seems to me to be a different sort of thing. And, for example, we already have __cpp_init_captures. Clark _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
