On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:50:05 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Tuesday 28 November 2006 16:01, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > 1) "FC-6" branch never points at "devel". > I know this
In the previous message you wrote: | but the only thing i thought was perhaps you had an old common | tree that had FC-6 pointing at devel. its a wild guess nothing | more. This would not lead to the same symptoms. Assume the following: Case 1: No "FC-6" branch and old "common" checkout. I would run "make build" in "devel" (where else?), which is still at ".fc6". But the job would target "devel", not "fc6"! Case 2: "FC-6" branch and old "common" checkout. I would run "make build" in "FC-6", which has no corresponding entry in the "common/branches" file. Would that work and produce good plague-client arguments which target "fc6"? Also note that no new tag was created, but an old tag was re-used. > > 2) An old common/branches can have "devel" point at ".fc6" instead of > > ".fc7". > > > > 3) The plague-client command-line does NOT contain anything like "devel" > > or "fc7". Only "fc6". > i know that and i could not repoduce your problem Interesting would be any theory, where the .fc7 (for the generated src.rpm) can come from when nothing in the plague-client args contains "fc7". > > 4) The buildsys was asked to build an fc6-tagged package for target fc6, > > but built a fc7 src.rpm. > Yes and i have not yet worked out why it did. Could you tar up your cvs > tree > so that i can disect it to see if it gives me any clues. Why? The local CVS working-copy is irrelevant. Everything is encoded in here: /usr/bin/plague-client build SDL_image SDL_image-1_2_5-2_fc6 fc6 It is a client that does not use CVS at all. -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list