2008/12/23 Jesse Keating <jkeat...@redhat.com>: > On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 14:53 -0500, Yaakov Nemoy wrote: >> 2008/12/23 Jesse Keating <jkeat...@redhat.com>: >> > On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 08:01 -0600, Joe Nall wrote: >> >> Sorry, I wasn't clear. Not an interactive install. >> > >> > Doesn't matter. Put the packages in the ks file you feed pungi and >> > they'll wind up in the compose, regardless if they get used later. >> >> Would this require a second ks file that omits the package name, for >> the automated install, so that it will be on the media, but not >> actually installed by default? >> > > There is no requirement that the ks file you use to compose is the same > ks file you use to install. In fact, them being so is somewhat silly, > as if you have a local mirror, just do your installs over the network, > instead of doing a compose and then installing from media.
I got the impression that Joe Nall was trying to use the same ks file. Hence i asked, so we could all be clear on the details. :) -Yaakov -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
