On Dec 23, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
2008/12/23 Jesse Keating <jkeat...@redhat.com>:
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 14:53 -0500, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
2008/12/23 Jesse Keating <jkeat...@redhat.com>:
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 08:01 -0600, Joe Nall wrote:
Sorry, I wasn't clear. Not an interactive install.
Doesn't matter. Put the packages in the ks file you feed pungi and
they'll wind up in the compose, regardless if they get used later.
Would this require a second ks file that omits the package name, for
the automated install, so that it will be on the media, but not
actually installed by default?
There is no requirement that the ks file you use to compose is the
same
ks file you use to install. In fact, them being so is somewhat
silly,
as if you have a local mirror, just do your installs over the
network,
instead of doing a compose and then installing from media.
I got the impression that Joe Nall was trying to use the same ks file.
Hence i asked, so we could all be clear on the details. :)
Old school testers like DVDs :)
joe
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
