We're able to produce metadata for our ingested objects, but without the
link to the actual object it seems a bit hampered. Is the proai
implementation a much better option?
On 28 July 2010 09:54, Peter Cliff <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> On 27/07/10 18:22, Deborah Kaplan wrote:
>
>> We're getting started with this as well, and we've gotten a very strong
>> message from Duraspace folks that we shouldn't be delivering the oai-dc
>> datastream because it should be for internal use only and we shouldn't
>> be overloading it.
>>
>
> I expect I'm missing something here, but isn't the point of OAI-PMH to
> deliver, at the very least, an oai-dc datastream? And isn't that a fairly
> fundamental feature of a repository? If so, what is the reasoning behind
> that "very strong message"?
>
> Like I said, I reckon I'm missing something important! :-)
>
> --
> Pete Cliff
> Software Engineer
> Bodleian Library, Oxford
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;226879339;13503038;l?
http://clk.atdmt.com/CRS/go/247765532/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Fedora-commons-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
