Perhaps it meant "within"...''
Yeah, that seems likely. On 8/23/06, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps it meant "within"... -> richard Benjamin Schmaus wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something here, but the 2nd sentence under the "File > Organization" section reads: > > "Of course, this excludes inner classes as these must be defined > without an (outer) class, and thus in the same file." > > Shouldn't the "without" be changed to "with"? By definition, you > can't have an inner class without an outer class, right? > > - Ben > > PS. I imagine many of you have seen the equinox coding practices doc, > but here's the link anyway: > http://www.eclipse.org/equinox/documents/coding.php. It's not as > detailed as the Felix doc that's been put together, but it still > assists in setting coding expectations. > > On 8/23/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tuesday 22 August 2006 05:11, Richard S. Hall wrote: >> > Overall, the style is fairly close to what I have been using in >> > Oscar/Felix for years now, except for { being on the same line. I am a >> > fan whitespace in code and I find that having the open { on a separate >> > line gives me less dense code that is easier to read. Thus, I could >> > pretty much go with it as is if we could move the { onto a line by >> itself. >> >> +1 to Marcel's basic and Richard's "opening brace on new line". >> >> Cheers >> Niclas >>
