That is fine by me.
-> richard
Francesco Furfari wrote:
Well, also a public repository is a form of code distribution.
Now at the Felix root there is the updated ASL 2.0 license while the
copyright notice mentions only ASF.
I was thinking to add something like:
--------------------------------------
Apache Felix
Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation
This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
The Felix project is composed of several subprojects,
for the copyright notice and related licenses see inside
the resources directory of each subproject:
/trunk/<project>/src/main/resources
----------------------------------------
It seems to me that in such way our statement is less ambiguous,
and help people to find the resources better.
francesco
Richard S. Hall wrote:
Francesco Furfari wrote:
Another question about the Notice files.
We are going to put the licenses and Notice file in resources
directories in order to embed them in the bundles.
I was thinking to the people that do the checkout from the
repository, and I was wondering if we should prepare a Notice file
that groups all the various notice files or more simply a reference
to find where they are.
I think the NOTICE and LICENSE files are for released artifacts, not
for svn checkout.
For our releases, if they aggregate released artifacts (which the
framework release definitely will), then we will need to have an
aggregate NOTICE file for that as well as including any necessary
license files too.
-> richard
