On Wednesday 25 October 2006 02:26, Francesco Furfari wrote: > Well, also a public repository is a form of code distribution.
Not by the ASF Board definition. SVN is not considered 'distribution'. The importance of that signficance is revolving around legal requirements of 'releases'. The SVN will by definition not be compliant at all times to the legal requirement, hence failure by design... > Now at the Felix root there is the updated ASL 2.0 license while the > copyright notice mentions only ASF. > > I was thinking to add something like: > > -------------------------------------- > Apache Felix > Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation > > This product includes software developed at > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). > > The Felix project is composed of several subprojects, > for the copyright notice and related licenses see inside > the resources directory of each subproject: > /trunk/<project>/src/main/resources > ---------------------------------------- > > It seems to me that in such way our statement is less ambiguous, > and help people to find the resources better. Please note that ASF is now using a different template text for these headers. Cheers Niclas
