Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > I'd like to do this, some time. The problem is that, pratically > speaking, > it's only skaller checking things into the repository. That, and > branching > still really sucks in subversion. I'm experimenting with git to see > how > effective we could be using that to develop felix (and other > projects). If > we could use that, we wouldn't have to interrupt skaller at all-ish > to have > multiple projects in development at the same time. Who knows if I can > convince skaller to use it, though :)
Why not use Darcs? John, if I recall correctly you have used darcs before. It is about as easy as git and very easy to branch. The only downside to darcs seems to be documentation for finding tags or patches: there is precious little documentation on what --matches patterns you can use (I can give you a summary--it is hidden in source code comments, mostly) and there is a bug where, if you have a --partial repository (just the most recent changes and a pristine copy) you can't push code to a --complete repository. Perhaps git is faster. The primary reason I suggest darcs is that John may be more familiar with it. Cheers, Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Felix-language mailing list Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
