On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 00:02 -0700, Raoul Duke wrote:
> I think maybe my discombobulation is more about making up my own
> inferred expectations about Felix from the sundry
> somewhat-not-entirely-consistend docs and pages and files, rather than
> there not being an underlying solid core. It is a shame for that core
> to not be more well known.
Yes, the docs are not complete or up to date. Are you a tech writer
that loves writing docs for a quickly changing language for no pay?
Personally I prefer developing software .. if I have to make
docs for a big system I'd rather generate them .. so figuring
out how to do that and then writing the generator is yet another
'build system' problem.
BTW: Felix does autogenerate simple things like lists of
keywords. However the real docs for say
"How does Felix lex a file?"
is to be found in the actual lexer code.. :)
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
