On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:39:38 +0100 Kent-Andre Mardal <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 25 February 2014 11:28, Jan Blechta <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:33:30 +0100 > > Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 06:27:29PM +0100, Jan Blechta wrote: > > > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:52:18 +0100 > > > > Nico Schlömer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Shouldn't -std=c++11 be switched for -std=c++0x which is > > > > > > only recognized by GCC 4.6 in Ubuntu Precise, the latest > > > > > > long-term release? > > > > > > > > > > Just bumped into this as well. > > > > > > > > This is already handled in DOLFIN (by CMake), so it is > > > > desirable to be handled also in UFC. Is it possible, Anders? > > > > Relevant code is line 10 > > > > > > > > CXX_FLAGS = "-std=c++11 " + os.environ.get("CXXFLAGS", "") > > > > > > > > in ffc/setup.py > > > > > > Sure this can be added, but I don't know how to check for which > > > flags are suppported. Is there a standard way to check for > > > supported compiler flags in distutils? > > > > It does not seem that there is a systematic way of doing this. What > > about try/except sequence for flags in [' -std=c++11 ', ' > > -std=c++0x ', ' ']. The latter should work with compilers which > > support C++0x/11 by default without flags. On fail, we could print > > out "Your compiler does not seem to support C++0x/11. Otherwise, > > set environment variable CXX_FLAGS appropriately." > > > > In the case that this would need speed-up, try/except loop could be > > performed with dummy file to detect respective flag. > > > > Jan > > > > > This sounds bothersome. Distutils support for C/C++ is really just a > hack on top of the Python system. Adding to CXX_FLAGS sounds like the > road to trouble on multiple platforms. There were good reasons for > removing Distutils from instant as it was unpredictable at times due > to our modifications of CXX_FLAGS etc. So what do you suggest with compiling UFC? Jan > > Kent > > > > > > > > -- > > > Anders > > > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > --Nico > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Jan Blechta > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Shouldn't -std=c++11 be switched for -std=c++0x which is > > > > > > only recognized by GCC 4.6 in Ubuntu Precise, the latest > > > > > > long-term release? > > > > > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:11:05 +0100 > > > > > > Johannes Ring <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Anders Logg > > > > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 03:00:01PM +0100, Johannes Ring > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Anders Logg > > > > > >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> >> > UFC has now been merged into FFC. Some work remains > > > > > >> >> > to do some cleanup after the merge (mostly merging of > > > > > >> >> > the documentation), but everything should work now. > > > > > >> >> > This means that FEniCS users no longer need to > > > > > >> >> > download and install UFC separately. > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > Some issues: > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > - Can we mark the UFC repository as discontinued on > > > > > >> >> > Bitbucket? Should it be removed? > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > - How do we handle installation in Dorsal? If we just > > > > > >> >> > remove the UFC package, then it will work for > > > > > >> >> > installation from the master branch but will fail for > > > > > >> >> > download of the latest stable version. > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> We can fix this temporarily by setting BUILDCHAIN=cmake > > > > > >> >> in ufc-stable.package and BUILDCHAIN=nothing in > > > > > >> >> ufc.package. This will checkout UFC from git but > > > > > >> >> nothing will be built or installed when > > > > > >> >> STABLE_BUILD=false. When 1.4 is release, we can remove > > > > > >> >> the UFC package. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Sounds good. Will you fix? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Yes, done. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Johannes > > > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > > > >> fenics mailing list > > > > > >> [email protected] > > > > > >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > fenics mailing list > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > fenics mailing list > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > fenics mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > > > > _______________________________________________ > > fenics mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > > _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
