On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:57:54 +0100 Johannes Ring <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Jan Blechta > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:39:38 +0100 > > Kent-Andre Mardal <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 25 February 2014 11:28, Jan Blechta <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:33:30 +0100 > >> > Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 06:27:29PM +0100, Jan Blechta wrote: > >> > > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:52:18 +0100 > >> > > > Nico Schlömer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Shouldn't -std=c++11 be switched for -std=c++0x which is > >> > > > > > only recognized by GCC 4.6 in Ubuntu Precise, the latest > >> > > > > > long-term release? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Just bumped into this as well. > >> > > > > >> > > > This is already handled in DOLFIN (by CMake), so it is > >> > > > desirable to be handled also in UFC. Is it possible, Anders? > >> > > > Relevant code is line 10 > >> > > > > >> > > > CXX_FLAGS = "-std=c++11 " + os.environ.get("CXXFLAGS", "") > >> > > > > >> > > > in ffc/setup.py > >> > > > >> > > Sure this can be added, but I don't know how to check for which > >> > > flags are suppported. Is there a standard way to check for > >> > > supported compiler flags in distutils? > >> > > >> > It does not seem that there is a systematic way of doing this. > >> > What about try/except sequence for flags in [' -std=c++11 ', ' > >> > -std=c++0x ', ' ']. The latter should work with compilers which > >> > support C++0x/11 by default without flags. On fail, we could > >> > print out "Your compiler does not seem to support C++0x/11. > >> > Otherwise, set environment variable CXX_FLAGS appropriately." > >> > > >> > In the case that this would need speed-up, try/except loop could > >> > be performed with dummy file to detect respective flag. > >> > > >> > Jan > >> > > >> > >> > >> This sounds bothersome. Distutils support for C/C++ is really just > >> a hack on top of the Python system. Adding to CXX_FLAGS sounds > >> like the road to trouble on multiple platforms. There were good > >> reasons for removing Distutils from instant as it was > >> unpredictable at times due to our modifications of CXX_FLAGS etc. > > > > So what do you suggest with compiling UFC? > > I have added a way to check if '-std=c++11' or ' -std=c++0x' are > supported in this branch: > > https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/ffc/branch/johannr/check-cxx-flag Nice, works on precise, GCC 4.6.3 Jan > > Other suggestions to solve this? Or should I merge it into master? > > Johannes > > > Jan > > > >> > >> Kent > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Anders > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Jan > >> > > > > >> > > > > --Nico > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Jan Blechta > >> > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > > Shouldn't -std=c++11 be switched for -std=c++0x which is > >> > > > > > only recognized by GCC 4.6 in Ubuntu Precise, the latest > >> > > > > > long-term release? > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Jan > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:11:05 +0100 > >> > > > > > Johannes Ring <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Anders Logg > >> > > > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 03:00:01PM +0100, Johannes > >> > > > > >> > Ring wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Anders Logg > >> > > > > >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> > UFC has now been merged into FFC. Some work remains > >> > > > > >> >> > to do some cleanup after the merge (mostly merging > >> > > > > >> >> > of the documentation), but everything should work > >> > > > > >> >> > now. This means that FEniCS users no longer need to > >> > > > > >> >> > download and install UFC separately. > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > Some issues: > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > - Can we mark the UFC repository as discontinued on > >> > > > > >> >> > Bitbucket? Should it be removed? > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > - How do we handle installation in Dorsal? If we > >> > > > > >> >> > just remove the UFC package, then it will work for > >> > > > > >> >> > installation from the master branch but will fail > >> > > > > >> >> > for download of the latest stable version. > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> We can fix this temporarily by setting > >> > > > > >> >> BUILDCHAIN=cmake in ufc-stable.package and > >> > > > > >> >> BUILDCHAIN=nothing in ufc.package. This will > >> > > > > >> >> checkout UFC from git but nothing will be built or > >> > > > > >> >> installed when STABLE_BUILD=false. When 1.4 is > >> > > > > >> >> release, we can remove the UFC package. > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > Sounds good. Will you fix? > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> Yes, done. > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> Johannes > >> > > > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> > > > > >> fenics mailing list > >> > > > > >> [email protected] > >> > > > > >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > > > > fenics mailing list > >> > > > > > [email protected] > >> > > > > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > > > fenics mailing list > >> > > > > [email protected] > >> > > > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > >> > > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > fenics mailing list > >> > > [email protected] > >> > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > fenics mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > fenics mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
