Ahh, will do!

Johan

On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Remember to also update test/unit/python/book/README with information
> about what was changed.
>
> --
> Anders
>
>
> Fri Dec 12 2014 at 4:31:41 PM skrev Martin Sandve Alnæs <
> [email protected]>:
>
>>  Sure. However with dof renumbering nobody should actually do that, you
>> could just make a note about that too.
>>
>> On 12 December 2014 at 16:26, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>  Ok, make sense.
>>>
>>>  The alternative syntax would here be to use arange from numpy.
>>>
>>>  b2 = b[arange(0, b.local_size(), 2)]
>>>
>>>  Johan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Martin Sandve Alnæs <[email protected]
>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  The policy is to avoid it if possible. However I think this is a good
>>>> case.
>>>> It's a while since 1.0 now, some things will have to change over time.
>>>>
>>>>  Just keep the line commented out, and add a comment like
>>>> # This feature has been removed because it is unsafe in parallel:
>>>> or something like that. Even better would be to add an alternative
>>>>  formulation, but I don't think that line makes much sense anyway?
>>>>
>>>>  Martin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On 12 December 2014 at 16:13, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>   Hello!
>>>>>
>>>>>  I am about to push the numpy index access for GenericVectors. As
>>>>> previously discussed I will remove support for slicing access. This breaks
>>>>> one book example. What is the policy for that? That was the whole point of
>>>>> having these tests there.
>>>>>
>>>>>  def test_p51_box_2():
>>>>>     b = Vector(mpi_comm_world(), 10)
>>>>>     c = Vector(mpi_comm_world(), 10)
>>>>>     b_copy = b[:]
>>>>>     b[:] = c
>>>>>     b[b < 0] = 0
>>>>>     b2 = b[::2]
>>>>>
>>>>>  The last line wont work.
>>>>>
>>>>>   Johan
>>>>>
>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>> fenics mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>>>>>
>>>>>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to